And just so it's perfectly clear,
we aren't
talking about her resigning (either gracefully or in disgrace). And
it's way too late for backhanded apologies, like the
'slap-in-the-face' she already gave the brave men and women who
have wore a uniform and proudly served this country.
Janet Napolitano must be FIRED... and it should have been
done yesterday!
You see, the problem is not just that Janet Napolitano's
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) put together a so-called
anti-terrorism
security assessment that targets mainstream Americans as dangerous
extremists.
We're talking about millions of
people who
believe that our government is too large and taxes us too much, like
those who participated in the TEA Parties on tax day. We are talking
about everyday Americans who believe that the 2nd Amendment actually
gives people the right to bear arms; people who are pro-life; the
millions of people who believe that our nation's immigration laws
should be strictly enforced.
And the problem is not simply that this so-called security
assessment targets patriotic Americans - and they are talking about
YOU - as "right wing extremists,"
or, as Peter Kirsanow with the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights put
it:
"That DHS report warning about all manner
of 'right-wing extremists' could be considerably shortened if it
simply alerted law-enforcement officials to be on the lookout for
people from 'small towns (who are) bitter (and) cling to guns or
religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or
anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment.'"
The problem is that this is the same Janet Napolitano who just
recently told us that horrendous, unspeakable acts committed by
actual terrorists, dead set on destroying our country and killing
Americans, should be called "man-caused
disasters."
Specifically she told Der Spiegel:
"In my speech, although I did not use the
word 'terrorism,' I referred to 'man-caused' disasters. That is
perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away
from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all
risks that can occur."
So... when it comes to actual acts or threats of terrorism
against mainstream Americans, we should move beyond the
"politics of fear."
But patriotic Americans like YOU -- who exercise your
Constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights -- pose a threat
to the government.
Is it actually possible that Napolitano and Barack Obama and
even some within the Obama Administration are so twisted as to
believe that Islamic Terrorists are the good guys and that you are
the bad guys?
Syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin in Thursday's
Washington Times wrote:
"What and who exactly are President Obama's
homeland security officials afraid of these days? If you are a
member of an active conservative group that opposes abortion, favors
strict immigration enforcement, lobbies to protect Second Amendment
rights, protests big government, advocates federalism, or represents
veterans who believe in any of the above, the answer is: You."
If what is contained in this leaked DHS security
assessment does not bring you to the realization that it is time for
all patriotic Americans who love freedom to stand up and shout that
we're not going to take it anymore... it is quite possible that
nothing will.
So, here's what we're going to do. We're going to make it very clear
that we want drastic action. We're going to make it very clear that
Janet Napolitano needs to go. We're going to make it very clear that
we want her FIRED - PERIOD... no resignations will be allowed... no
meaningless apologies will be accepted.
We're going to bang this issue like a gong.
The DHS Report Targets All Of You Bitter People
Out There Who Cling To Guns And Religion.
Malkin is not alone. Syndicated radio talk-show host Michael
Reagan went so far as to ask the following:
"Have we really come to this? Has Adolf
Hitler's propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels been reborn and recruited
by the Obama administration to scare the heck out of the American
people with absurdities such as this whacked-out document?"
Lance Fairchok writing for AmericanThinker.com hits the
nail squarely on the head.
Calling this so-called security assessment
"a shot across the bow" he
plainly states that DHS is NOT simply referring to
individuals living on society's fringe.
The
assessment is, in fact, referring to YOU and patriotic Americans
like you.
Moreover, Fairchok believes this assessment was
hastily and
sloppily written in order to fit a sick and disgusting preconceived
notion:
"This 'assessment' is not an analysis of a
national trend or an examination of existing evidence or even recent
radical literature; it is targeting those whose politics fall within
the broad insinuations contained within its pages, namely mainstream
conservatives."
Judge Andrew Napolitano with FOX News essentially says
the same thing:
"The summary contains few proper names, has
no footnotes of any significance, lists very few sources, and is
drafted with a prejudice against anyone who criticizes the role of
the federal government in our lives today. It lumps together in its
definition of 'rightwing extremism' hate groups, anti-government
groups, and single issue groups 'such as opposition to abortion or
immigration.'"
Let's state it more plainly. As far as Janet Napolitano's
DHS is concerned,
if you are
pro-life or believe in strict enforcement of our immigration laws,
or if you attended one of those TEA parties, you're the same as a
neo-Nazi, or a member of the KKK. You are dangerous and pose no less
a threat than the real terrorists trying to destroy our great
country. Is it possible that when Barack Obama spoke of bitter
people from small towns who cling to God and their guns that he was
not just simply being derisive?
Is it possible that pointing out that Barack Obama sat in a
Church for years listening to a lunatic pontificate,
"Not God Bless America... God D___ America"
WAS relevant after all?
There's only one way to find out.
Let Barack Obama and our elected officials know, in no uncertain
terms, that ANY action other than the immediate termination of Janet
Napolitano constitutes a clear admission that Obama, in fact,
supports the chilling implications of this DHS monstrosity.
What purpose can be served by a document that classifies
mainstream Americans as "extremists"
who pose a clear and present danger to our nation's security?
Fairchok again:
"It is a manipulative information tool
intended to paint the loyal opposition as reactionary kooks who are
prone to violence and a danger to the country. ... This is part of a
more widespread ongoing information campaign to plant and reinforce
critical themes into the American official, and broader public
psyche, a continuation of the 'clinging to guns and religion'
message so frequently found in the rhetoric of President Obama and
his acolytes."
And Fairchok concludes by issuing a very somber warning.
"And we ain't seen nothin' yet."
But what is even more disturbing is that
DHS NEVER
intended the public to see this so-called security assessment. It
was a secret.
Reagan again:
"Obviously recognizing that public
knowledge of the nonsense alleged in this document is very
undesirable, the weirdoes who prepared it did not want you to see
it. ... They warn: 'No portion of the LES (Law Enforcement
Sensitive) information should be released to the media, the general
public, or over non-secure Internet servers.'"
Judge Napolitano again:
"The document itself cautions the reader
that the document is 'not to be released to the public, the media,
or other personnel who do not have a valid need-to-know without
prior approval' of the DHS. The document refers to itself as one of
a series of intelligence assessments intended to 'deter, prevent,
preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United
States.'"
But there's even more.
Are you ready for this?
The
portion of this so-called security assessment that was leaked is
only a SUMMARY.
The bulk
of it remains CLASSIFIED. We have no idea what's in it.
Judge Napolitano continues:
"The summary
(unclassified) document is terrifying. One can only imagine what is
contained in the classified version. This document runs directly
counter to numerous U.S. Supreme decisions prohibiting the
government from engaging in any activities that could serve to chill
the exercise of expressive liberties. Liberties are chilled, in
constitutional parlance, when people are afraid to express
themselves for fear of government omnipresence, monitoring, or
reprisals. The document also informs the reader that Big Brother is
watching both public and private behavior."
But whatever else is in there... it cannot be pretty.
Judge Napolitano yet again:
"My guess is
that the sentiments revealed in the report I read are the tip of an
iceberg that the DHS would prefer to keep submerged until it needs
to reveal it. This iceberg is the heavy-hand of government; a
government with large and awful eyes, in whose heart there is no
love for freedom, and on whose face there is no smile."
There is no time to lose, we must act now.
Let Barack Obama and our elected officials know, in no uncertain
terms, that ANY action other than the immediate termination of Janet
Napolitano constitutes a clear admission that Obama, in fact,
supports the chilling implications of this DHS monstrosity.
